Gigandet, good too).Īnd why are so many Tyler and Ryan? Another point in favor of the director Wadlow, parenting behaviors. ![]() Wadlow's skill is to show a Tyler, despite all the events, yet master of himself and how? Serious commitment and application in everything he does'. Acts, actions, attitudes, no longer have a rational place, we become judges themselves too hard with all its consequences and emotional suffering. In guilt, however, the mind begins a journey all illogical. When you are aware of the actions committed, good or bad you are and you take all the consequences, show what is called sense of responsibility, maturity. The mother, try to judge the mother, poses and not a little to his son the whole story. Drunken father, Tyler does not replace driving, accident and death of the father. Well, I got in some aspect of the film.įeelings of guilt are terrible whipping, comparable in terms of inner pain, the scourging. I confess that the two faces, one of Jeff, and indeed that of Jake Tyler (Sean Faris) led me to watching this film. I watch him, always see in him a deep and serenity, is a boy who transmits serenity and confidence. See also knows those who can listen to a director is crucial. Heard of him and you know why? Why is a person who listens. ![]() Jeff Wadlow, try looking in a profound way the face of this guy. Extremism, including reviews, I am not convinced. If I act in this way, throw in a basket that is a film of a film, I threw away, in every sense, the work of many people. ![]() I think this an extreme opinion on a film. Personally, I am convinced that no film, admitted to public viewing, can be scored with the words used by Jake Tyler, "useless junk, useless junk. The bitterness then turns into sadness when I hear and see film experts, on television, expressing distaste with sarcasm, maybe even embarrassed about putting something on that particular film has to say. I feel a strong sense of sadness when I read reviews of films classified by not lovers like that "useless, barren, arid, money thrown away, but stupid, like so. ![]() And Hounsou, though he delivers a one-note performance, is still fun to watch.Ok, by now on the merits. The script isn't memorable, but the dialogue is believable, and star Faris is blessed with an easy smile and a likable swagger. The movie's also riddled with cliches there's a supportive girlfriend, a funny sidekick, mantras ("Control the outcome"), and even a race between the mentor and the mentee that's a straight rip-off of Rocky.ĭirector Jeff Wadlow does manage to drum up some excitement by letting the action unspool with a light touch. There's little nuance or complication and so many fight scenes that when the movie finally gets to the big beat down, it's almost anti-climactic - it just feels like yet another battle. And though, like better sports films, the film does attempt to reveal the internal struggles that fuel the physical ones, it does so with overly broad strokes. The cuts are so quick that you can't appreciate any technique. Fight movies have their place in cinematic history ( Rocky, anyone?) done right, they manage to capture the humanity in the brutality and the poetry in the punch, but NEVER BACK DOWN doesn't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |